Some benchmarks with Radeon and Xorg7.1
Paulo J. Matos
pocmatos at gmail.com
Fri Jun 9 12:30:21 PDT 2006
On 09/06/06, Donnie Berkholz <spyderous at gentoo.org> wrote:
> Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> > I've tested X against three options: AGPFastWrite, EnablePageFlip and
> > AccelMethod. Both of these have 2 possible values, True/False for the
> > first two and XAA/EXA for the last one. I start fluxbox, 54 processes
> > are running with an average of 0% CPU, 138112 used RAM and 377896 free
> > RAM. The benchmarks table is as follows (CPU is average during
> > glxgears runtime and FPS are given by glxgears):
> > Method EnablePageFlip AGPFastWrite FPS CPU
> > XAA False False 702 10%
> > XAA False True 702 10%
> > XAA True False 978 14%
> > XAA True True 978 14%
> > EXA False False 661 10%
> > EXA False True 661 10%
> > EXA True False 661 10%
> > EXA True True 661 10%
>
> It is interesting to see that you get almost a 50% increase in glxgears
> from page flipping, but only when using XAA. It would be even more
> interesting to see benchmarks of some real-world programs.
>
What's the definition of real-world apps and how would you take the
benchmarks on those apps if they explicitly don't show FPS values?
> Thanks,
> Donnie
>
>
>
>
--
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at sat inesc-id pt
Web: http://sat.inesc-id.pt/~pocm
Computer and Software Engineering
INESC-ID - SAT Group
More information about the xorg
mailing list