xkbActions.c + #ifdef XFree86Server

[Enrico Weigelt]

* Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> schrieb:

> > I'm currently working on moving the DDX dependent code to the
> > servers itself and let it be called via an ddx_callback structure
> > (as we already discussed lately), so I'm going to put it in there,
> > if nobody has an better idea.
> 
> Actions should be punted up to the DDX using a filter mechanism 
> (return 'stolen', 'continue', or 'drop it').

I'm currently just doing (formal) code separation to get clean
frontlines, leaving the semantics unchanged. The chance of errors 
should be quite minimal. Let's get this done first, before 
introducing new semantics. 

Meanwhile we of can carefully think about your filter mechanism.
What exaclty do you have in mind ?


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
 	http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
 Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
	http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------