mga driver / HALlib

Ian Romanick idr at us.ibm.com
Fri Jul 28 08:58:58 PDT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stefan Dirsch wrote:

> Sure. But here we're again at "* nobody cares enough". :-( What the
> users usually see is the regression in the driver.

A certain amount of this is actually on my todo list.  Is there a grand,
unified list anywhere of exactly what features on which hardware
currently require the use of mgahal?  The only thing that I know of is
dual-head on G400 cards.  Is there more?

I tend to agree with the sentiment of gutting all the mgahal support
from the driver.  Then we can gradually add the missing features back
one at a time.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEyjRCX1gOwKyEAw8RAngFAKCXr8Ub2InOFY3w3IKrCZIT21HYAwCfYOaJ
EtEUwmcnfZ+5k8yovAafSeo=
=ObKX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the xorg mailing list