libXfont version inconsistency ?

Daniel Stone daniel at
Wed Jul 26 03:56:36 PDT 2006

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:10:52PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm at> schrieb:
> > Think what will happen when someone does some code rework without 
> > breaking ABI and will give version 2.0 to libXfont ... 
> He simply shouldn't. What should legitimate such an huge version 
> jump if the ABI is untouched ? On an major jump, people expect
> something totally new, which is incompatible with the previous 
> version (maybe even on source level).

So you're saying that we should be on X17, not X11R7?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the xorg mailing list