libXfont version inconsistency ?
daniel at freedesktop.org
Wed Jul 26 03:56:36 PDT 2006
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 12:10:52PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm at pld-linux.org> schrieb:
> > Think what will happen when someone does some code rework without
> > breaking ABI and will give version 2.0 to libXfont ...
> He simply shouldn't. What should legitimate such an huge version
> jump if the ABI is untouched ? On an major jump, people expect
> something totally new, which is incompatible with the previous
> version (maybe even on source level).
So you're saying that we should be on X17, not X11R7?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the xorg