accidental 'origin' branches in git repositories

[Keith Packard]

On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 19:21 +0200, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> Keith Packard [2006-07-08 09:40]:
> > I'd like to figure out a way to avoid having 'origin' branches appear in
> > git trees. I think it happens with 'git-push --all', which seems like an
> > obvious thing to do.
> 
> Damn, I'm sorry. I noticed something weird was going on, but I didn't
> realize it was the origin-branch problem.

I think almost everyone gets a chance to do this at some point; it seems
so obviously what you want to do.

> Maybe we should talk to the git maintainers. git should rather die than
> create a branch called "origin".

Actually, what 'push' should do is not include branches mapped in a
remotes file.
-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20060708/4b4a6058/attachment.pgp>