Suggested Xprint DDX reorg

[Daniel Stone]

On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 07:28:21PM +0100, Julien Lafon wrote:
> On 1/5/06, Adam Jackson <ajax at nwnk.net> wrote:
> > We've got five DDXes that are complex enough to need or want auxiliary tools
> > or config bits.  Right now we have:
> > [stuff]
> >
> > For parallelism I'd rather see the Xprint DDX moved under hw and its config
> > bits under that:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Does anyone have a compelling case against this?
> 
> See below.
> 
> > If not I'll probably shuffle
> > this around sometime this weekend.
> 
> It does not sound not logical to me - Xprint DDX is no physical
> hardware so why should it be tagged as such?

When you see 'hw', read 'ddx'.