Latest Xgl code

David Reveman davidr at novell.com
Tue Jan 3 06:35:13 PST 2006


On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 21:24 +1100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >
> > > The main reason I'd like to merge your current tree back into kdrive
> > > tree is for two reasons
> > > 1) we've got too many trees already,
> > > 2) merging into trees gives us a better idea when changes bust
> > > something badly, I've already re-written the configure.ac to still
> > > allow kdrive to be useful...
> >
> > If most people like this better that's fine with me. I'll help out as
> > much as I can.
> 
> Okay I've merged up your current tree to kdrive server, it should work
> the same as the codedrop you've given out, except you'll need Mesa
> CVS....

Great, Thanks!

> 
> >
> > I agree. I'll probably have a few updates in the next couple of days to
> > the code drop I did today but I'll provide these as patches.
> 
> Well now you should be able to work the patches against the kdrive
> tree, I've commited the fb/render changes that as individual patchsets
> so as to make them easier for keithp/anholt (hint hint) to take a look
> at :-)
> 
> If you can check the xserver tree operates like the tree you dropped
> I'll try and make sure the Xegl works the same as I hoped it would....

xserver seams to be working OK. I'll check on x86_64 later tonight as
well. There were some problems with _XSERVER64 not being define when
building mesa sources and I had to go through some trouble making that
work in my tree. I want to make sure that's not a problem again...

-David




More information about the xorg mailing list