PCI Subsystem Rework for X.org 7.1 Proposal
Egbert Eich
eich at suse.de
Sun Feb 5 01:31:22 PST 2006
Ian Romanick writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > o ISA? (I definitely don't care about this one, and if we did it could
> > probably just have its own API)
There is not much to do for an API. However since it hangs off
the PCI bus on a PCI system it needs to have access to the
PCI structure. It's really not too much overhead.
> > o PCI
> > o AGP
> > o PCIe
> > o sbus?
> > o MCA?
We never had support for that.
>
> o Zorro?
>
> > PCI, AGP, and PCIe can probably be covered by this API (with AGP
> > requiring some additions I suppose), as long as we handle the "mapping
> > with attributes" issue well.
Right.
Egbert.
More information about the xorg
mailing list