> Aside from the 0 != NULL bit and FORTRAN style, you appear to be looking > at quite an old codebase: What FORTRAN bit? :) As for the codebase, sorry, that was my bad. I have two working trees. One HEAD, one 7.1.1. The patch was against 7.1.1 and I forgot to check head before firing off the mail. Note to self: use head (and HEAD) more often :P Kean