glib dependency for the X Server

Ikke eikke at
Mon Apr 3 04:02:50 PDT 2006

On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 12:58 +0200, Erwin Rol wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 19:41 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > > So I think glib wouldn't be that bad of a choice. 
> > 
> > abort().
> Did anybody asked the glib developers if that could be changed ? It
> would probably not be that big a deal to add some OOM handler that
> defaults to abort() but can be set to something else by the user (Xorg
> in this case). 
Just started working on a minor patch for this. Although I doubt it'll
be accepted... Who knows ;-)


More information about the xorg mailing list