glib dependency for the X Server

Daniel Stone daniel at
Mon Apr 3 00:25:54 PDT 2006

On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:08:41AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> No, LGPL is not the same as the X/MIT or BSD license. It has more 
> constraints.
> O.Org has firmly stated in the past that it would keep its code under 
> the X/MIT license, so this is unacceptable.

This is not X.Org's code, it's ancillary.  You could make the argument
that there's no usable MIT-licensed compiler, either, so X's dependency
on same is also unacceptable.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the xorg mailing list