glib dependency for the X Server
eric at anholt.net
Sun Apr 2 18:49:27 PDT 2006
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 20:14 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sunday 02 April 2006 19:42, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > Talking individually with people, I've had a good response to this (and
> > it wasn't originally my idea, anyway). I'm posting this here to make it
> > not be a shock when it happens, and give an opportunity for showstopper
> > issues with this plan to be brought up.
> As brought up on IRC, and just recording it here for posterity, glib really
> isn't an option as long as it abort()s on malloc failure.
> Fundamentally I really like the idea of removing our half-baked portable
> runtime layer and picking someone else's that works. Let's not solve
> problems twice.
Yeah, abort() on malloc failure internally really kills this idea.
Eric Anholt anholt at FreeBSD.org
eric at anholt.net eric.anholt at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the xorg