RandR bugs

[Michel Dänzer]

On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 11:12 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> 
> Also, I'm not sure RRFunc is needed at all. It seems to me that
> xf86SwitchMode() is good enough to let the driver handle the necessary
> switch.
> 
> The only thing that is missing is a call that the driver can make to
> obtain the current rotation mode (i.e. randrp->rotation). Removing the
> need completely for RRFunc.

Isn't DriverFunc still useful in that it allows the driver to cancel a
rotation that it doesn't support?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer      |     Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast    |   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer