Xgl status

[Gregory Shklover]

Hi, David.
Glad to hear that.
You also answered the question I thought of but didn't ask: whether it
would be reasonable to merge the code into Xorg xserver tree.
The later should hopefully make it more accessible attract more interest
to the project. Have you been developing the changes you speak of on
Xorg tree or on the kdrive?

Thanks,
Gregory.

On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 08:35 -0400, David Reveman wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 17:11 +0200, Gregory Shklover wrote:
> > Hi,
> > What is the status of Xgl development?
> > It seems that the last check-in was several months ago, and it
> > actually doesn't compile with glitz CVS anymore...
> > Was this project abandoned?
> 
> I've been doing a lot of work on Xgl and I have a bunch of major updates
> but none of them have made it into CVS yet. Glitz CVS is pretty much up
> to date, though.
> 
> It's more likely that I'll move my new Xgl code into Xorg after the
> modularization is complete and 7.0 is released than trying to merge it
> into the kdrive tree. However, I should probably update the current CVS
> code so that it at least compiles with glitz CVS...
> 
> -David
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20051013/98c88938/attachment.html>