FB-access-wrapper?

[Keith Packard]

Around 18 o'clock on Jan 16, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:

> No, I read the code and it still seems to submit a set of boxes to the
> update routine. What would be the difference then, except that a
> different block handler does the work?

There's not much difference now that you've built your own block handler, 
except that it sounds like you've added some timeout to limit updates to 
specific intervals, which seems like a generally useful idea.  Providing 
some mechanism to delay the updates until the 'right time' might be a good 
general change.  For displays with vsync info, it would be great if we 
could get the update prepared right before that data was read out to the 
screen.

-keith


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20050116/1fd4e951/attachment.pgp>