New libXvMC wrapper.

[Adam Jackson]

On Tuesday 21 September 2004 18:34, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Hi, list!
>
> Anybody opposed to this going in it's current form? If not, it will be
> enabled for linux and gcc, where I know the -nostartfiles option will work.

Why do you need -nostartfiles?

As mentioned earlier, the XvMC protocol really should ask the server for the 
name of the client driver to load, the way DRI does.  But this is certainly 
better than requiring every XvMC client to know about every possible driver.

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20040921/71cc1726/attachment.pgp>