[Xorg] X.org CVS branches need to change
jdennis at redhat.com
Mon Mar 15 10:39:26 PST 2004
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 13:17, Keith Packard wrote:
> [ CVS policy snipped for brevity ]
> Does any of this seem weird or controversial to anyone?
Thank you Keith, this seems exactly how it should work, is very sane and
matches conventional practice.
Only one minor nit with respect to tinderbox, it should definitely build
HEAD as you suggest, but just prior to a release there should be a
tinderbox for the release and hopefully there is a mechanism whereby
builds only occur when a change goes into the tree. I'll check and see.
More information about the xorg