[Xorg] Re: CVS access policy, branching/tagging, code review, etc.

[Keith Packard]

Around 15 o'clock on Mar 2, "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" wrote:

> Maybe in some organizations. The way this tree was originally set up it 
> is intended that HEAD be the release vehicle.

I'd really rather see "normal" development done on HEAD with releases done 
on branches; the expectation is that the release branch will provide a 
place for back-porting of security fixes with future minor releases.  How 
is that done in the CURRENT-STABLE-HEAD world?

-keith


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20040302/a5b7dac6/attachment.pgp>