[Xorg] The big multiconsole nasty
Egbert Eich
eich at pdx.freedesktop.org
Wed Jul 7 04:21:21 PDT 2004
Keith Whitwell writes:
>
> Ugh. That would be the ugliest. If it goes, it should go completely.
>
> Note that most drivers nowadays include a kernel component, so OS-independent
Not true.
> modules in the userspace are pretty pointless.
>
> Does anyone test that these modules actually can be run on another O/S? Does
> anyone care if they can't? Does any vendor actually make use of this?
1. It has been tested.
2. That's what we should find out.
3. That's not the point. A ia32 xyzBSD user can go and get the linux driver
and it should work.
>
> If someone really cares about cross-platform drivers, the module loader in
> XFree86 isn't a great place to start. For starters, there's the kernel
> problem I mentioned, but also I have to question how useful OS-independence is
> if you don't also gain CPU-independence.
The kernel problem doesn't exist in the form you describe.
Most drivers still work well without a chipset specific kernel driver.
In fact on some OSes that we support there isn't even the possibility to load
a driver into the kernel.
Egbert.
More information about the xorg
mailing list