[Xorg] RELEASE-1 merged into CURRENT
Keith Packard
keithp at keithp.com
Tue Apr 20 11:46:30 PDT 2004
Around 11 o'clock on Apr 20, Egbert Eich wrote:
> Well, we may see stuff go into branches which may never go into the
> trunk.
That's the nice thing about using the common ChangeLog; if those changes
don't get merged onto HEAD, then the ChangeLog entries won't get merged
either. The ChangeLog entries should get merged along with the affected
files; that way everything tracks together.
> > That would leave your nice hierarchical
> > ChangeLog format and not require separate ChangeLog files for each branch.
>
> Right. I wouldn't mind to have all this automated either.
> However my Perl skills are limited and I'm a little reluctand
> to do this in awk.
> Any volunteer?
I can try and poke at the prepare-ChangeLog.pl script, but I will admit
that I know no more perl than you. I'm afraid too much of our
infrastructure is starting to rely on a language that none of us want to
learn...
-ketih
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20040420/6284271e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg
mailing list