[bug#8081] new style function syntax
gordon.jin at intel.com
Wed Sep 6 06:17:30 EEST 2006
Geoff Clare wrote:
> Jin, Gordon <gordon.jin at intel.com> wrote, on 05 Sep 2006:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm not understanding why old style function declaration syntax [e.g.
>> int check_dec();] supercedes new style function declaration syntax
>> [e.g. int check_dec(long, long, char*);] in some cases.
>> At least, XtTestProto.h on Linux has this issue, resulting in 3 Xt
>> cases fail on x86-64 due to the implicit type.
>> I've opened bug#8081 and submited patch:
>> Comments welcome.
> Rather than add -DMIXOLDANDNEW to the configuration, I would be
> inclined to change XtTestProto.h either to make it use the same
> mechanism as Vlib.h to decide whether to use prototypes, or just
> to delete the old declarations and always use the prototypes.
Thanks for your comments.
If no one provides reason to hold the old declarations, I'm going to
More information about the xorg-test