Modules created and initial files checked in

[Keith Packard]

On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 13:53 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:

> If you think it's doable, then by all means let's do it.

I can't see any real impediments -- the clients have a fixed set of
symbols they need and there isn't any reason we can't shuffle the actual
files containing them around.

> SGI-SCREEN-SAVER already exists, though only in Xsgi I believe.  I just don't 
> like having a non-trivial mapping between extension name and source module, 
> historical accidents in library naming aside.

yeah, the library name 'Xss' is far from ideal.

I guess I don't really care what we call the modules for
MIT-SCREEN-SAVER; they aren't used enough to be that big a deal.

We could also consider migrating the library name from libXss to
libXScreenSaver, but I can't see a lot of value in that as we'll have to
retain the Xss name forever.

-keith

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050509/6c4925e8/attachment-0001.pgp