Modularization mailing list and initial strawman proposal

[John Davidorff Pell]

If we're not going to go with GNU autotools, then I vote for jam. :-)  
Of course, I think this is a moot point as we're almost certainly  
going with GNU autotools here :-)

JP


On 24 Mar 2005, at 18:54, Adam Jackson wrote:

> If this is seriously an issue - major "if" there - I would strongly  
> prefer
> that we simply adopt one of the other MIT-ish licensed build systems:
>
> http://www.scons.org/
> http://www.perforce.com/jam/jam.html
> http://www.cmake.org/HTML/About.html