[PATCH] autoshit/libfool fixes

[Daniel Stone]

On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 06:18:21PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:
> > Next time you submit patches, please make them easier to access, and
> rsync is not easy ?

Patches attached to mails are easy to look over and evaluate.  rsync
requires far more effort.

> > include explanations of your patches.  What is this actually for?
> It lets it search beyond $SYSROOT for .la files. 
> Without that, its *impossible* to build libfool'ed packages in
> a sysroot environment.

What exactly is a 'sysroot environment'?

> > (And why is the patching so incredibly inconsistent?)
> inconsistent ? in which way ?

Some patches spew out a bunch of debugging information, and all of them
seem to have different patches to ltmain.sh.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050613/08edda1c/attachment.pgp