[PATCH] autoshit/libfool fixes
Enrico Weigelt
weigelt at metux.de
Sun Jun 12 09:04:52 PDT 2005
* Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:
Hi,
> Please just provide diffs, it's much easier. Also, which
> tree are you syncing against -- xlibs or xorg/lib?
These are just some quick-and-dirty patches against latest xlibs.
The links i've posted point to my public patch repository, which
has some structure
./src/... -> several different diffs
./autopatch/... -> patches against several releases
./Makefile -> creates patches from diffs
Most of the patches you'll find there are fixes, necessary to get
the packages working in a clean (jail/sysroot) build environment.
So 99% are fixes in broken build stuff (95% broken autoshit,
5% unfinished makefiles). Many of them are quite dirty hacks and
not thought very well, but in this way a good supplement to autoshit.
My research in the last half decade as shown that autoshit/libfool
are completely misdesigned take even more time for maintenance than
carefully handwritten makefiles, and its really the time for some
new - purely declarative approach - describing the structure of
software instead of the rules to control process, and let some
intelligent generic buildsystem (adadopted to each platform/target
only *once*) the whole work. But that's really another story ...
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service
phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/
fax: +49 36207 519932 email: contact at metux.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Realtime Forex/Stock Exchange trading powered by postgresSQL :))
http://www.fxignal.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the xorg-modular
mailing list