.so versions for libraries

[Keith Packard]

On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 10:16 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> As promised earlier, an example for the library so revisions.
> I chose libXext mainly because it builds faster than libX11,
> but has different revs on different platforms already.

That patch looks right to me; I assume we need to audit every library to
check SO versions for each supported platform.

For new libraries, I'd like to insist that we use the libtool version
numbering mechanisms which compute platform-specific version numbers
from platform-independent version information. I've done this for all of
the libraries I modularlized.

-keith

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050715/95cb2eb8/attachment.pgp