Development plan -- time to move forward

[Keith Packard]

On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 02:48 -0400, Kevin E Martin wrote:
> onolithic tree at all.
> 
> It just adds meaningless lines to every souce file in the monolithic
> tree.  I agree that AM_CONFIG_HEADER is very useful for dependencies,
> but is it an absolute requirement for the initial release given the
> caveat that it will be added immediately following the initial release?

I think it's important enough to avoid dependency problems and avoid
this change afterwards to get it done right now.

The changes are harmless to the monolithic tree, aside from a bit of
patch churn.

-keith

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050424/c383d0c5/attachment.pgp