Modularization proposal approved

Daniel Stone daniel at fooishbar.org
Mon Apr 18 05:24:03 PDT 2005


On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:12:47PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> I think the point is we only have one set of sources .. and we create
> links to the monolith from the auto-tooled tree initially so we don't
> get out of sync.. the plan is not to re-do Debrix or xlibs as-is, or
> maybe I've missed something, the impression I got from reading the
> docs was you would still require a monolith tree checked out, you
> would check out the auto-tools framework and it would link the files
> over and to the build in the autotooled framework,

I'm not sure on the specifics here; whether it will be a script to
migrate everything, or whatever.  I thought this was just one of the
options, and that the main use would be in CVS modules?  Which would
require extreme developer discipline.

> then just before we launch 7.0 we just move all the files across in
> the repoistory and drop the links..

Hum.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050418/301cb6e2/attachment.pgp


More information about the xorg-modular mailing list