Modularization development notes [was Re: RFA sent to the
ArchWG]
Jeremy C. Reed
reed at reedmedia.net
Thu Apr 14 14:42:41 PDT 2005
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Kevin E Martin wrote:
> Should we remove Xpm from the lib module as well and just include it
> from the upstream source as a tarball? Also, who is the upstream
> maintainer? It seems we've applied quite a few fixes but I wonder how
> many of them have been pushed back upstream.
http://www.inria.fr/koala/lehors/xpm.html was the main Xpm webpage. But no
source code updates since March 19, 1998. Over nine fixes since then.
I believe most Unix flavors and Linux distributions provide Xpm from their
XFree86 or Xorg since it is better maintained.
We already have libXpm modularized (/cvs/xlibs/Xpm). It appears to have
been last updated (by Daniel) on January 29, 2005 to "Import security
fixes from X.Org HEAD."
Jeremy C. Reed
BSD News, BSD tutorials, BSD links
http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/
More information about the xorg-modular
mailing list