Modularization proposal updated

[Adam Jackson]

On Monday 11 April 2005 17:20, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Kevin E Martin wrote:
> > I have updated the modularization proposal as discussed.  The changes
> > were to generalize the driver module (as suggested by Keith and myself)
> > and explain that the configure options will be both standardized and
> > documented (as suggested by Egbert et al.).  The updated proposal can be
> > found here:
> >
> >     http://wiki.x.org/wiki/ModularizationProposal
>
> Two things:
> 1. XRX is still no DDX (it mainly belongs into the app/ module AFAIK)

It's a wiki, you know. ;)

> 2. Where should server-specific config files stored (I am mainly
> thinking about the whole XpConfig/ hieracy which the print server needs
> to start (e.g. it will refuse to start without having those files so
> they should be placed close to the server sources IMO)) ?

Config files belong with the app that needs them.

Does this mean a combined print+display server will fail to start display 
graphics if the XpConfig hierarchy is missing?

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-modular/attachments/20050411/e0f264de/attachment.pgp