<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320">bug 95320</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:lizzi.swane@gmail.com" title="Lizzi Swane <lizzi.swane@gmail.com>"> Lizzi Swane</a> <pre>When the system boots, it boots into 1920x1080. if i use then the xrandr to set underscan to on the desktop size is still greater than the viewable area. With underscan off the best resolution i can get is 1024x768 with the opensource driver and with underscan set to on the best resolution i can get is 1280x720. However, with catalyst i can get 1776x1000, 1600x900, & 1400x900 that scale well to the viewable are. A few others are availaable but its the 1600x900 that i like. The opensource driver isn't providing those resolutions but the catalyst does, hence my request that the opensource driver display the same resolutions as the fglrx. This is of huge concern to me because with the new crimson drivers that amd has released, my apu and all 5000 and 6000 series gpus have reached eol for non-free support. If you won't support these cards to their full no one else will. Thank you for your help!</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>