<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320#c15">Comment # 15</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Neither ATI nor AMDGPU supports the resolutions for my 6520g BeaverCreek Graphics that catalyst does"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95320">bug 95320</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:alexdeucher@gmail.com" title="Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Alex Deucher</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Lizzi Swane from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=95320#c14">comment #14</a>)
<span class="quote">> so what can i do? Catalyst/fglrx has some notion of it in spite of the edid
> not reporting all it's modes. How does catalyst do that when the opensource
> driver can not?</span >
Maybe I misunderstood your question. I thought you said catalyst couldn't see
1366x768 either?
With respect to the modes exposed by default, catalyst adds "fake" modes that
use the GPU scaler by default while radeon does not.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>