[Bug 97619] New: Rotated Display Output Fractured

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Tue Sep 6 22:51:35 UTC 2016


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97619

            Bug ID: 97619
           Summary: Rotated Display Output Fractured
           Product: xorg
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: x86 (IA32)
                OS: Linux (All)
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: Driver/Radeon
          Assignee: xorg-driver-ati at lists.x.org
          Reporter: klsu at cox.net
        QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org

Created attachment 126256
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=126256&action=edit
Output of sudo lspci -vv for one machine with the described problem.

Because this one is hard to describe, it has taken a long time to find anyone
else with the problem, but here it is:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/783358/visual-glitches-when-rotating-display-ati-radeon

The problem appeared after upgrading to XUbuntu 16.04 on 2 32-bit Pentium 4
machines. Any display that is rotated becomes unintelligible because it is not
delivered to the display properly, and I cannot send a screen shot because the
screen shot records what should be on the screen, not what is displayed. On
this machine I have 2 monitors, one 1920x1080 horizontal, and one to the right,
1280x1024 rotated 90 degrees clockwise with the picture must be rotated left.
The horizontal monitor displays normally, the picture on the rotated one is
divided into 128 vertical bands, 8 pixels wide, and the vertical bands appear
to be divided into 40 segments 32 pixels high. The vertical bands do not always
contain information that belongs with the bands adjacent to them, but possibly
with the bands one band away on each side (reminds me of an interlace pattern).
The vertical blocks containing information that might belong to blocks above
and below them are also alternated with blocks containing other information,
and appear to be stretched vertically (2x?). Knowing what the background
picture is, I recognized 8x32 pixel pieces, but the picture is so fractured as
to be unrecognizable. If I open a window on the rotated display, it is so
fractured and stretched that I cannot tell where the top of the window is, and
if I slide an open window from the left desktop to the rotated one so the "x"
(in the close window button) appears on the rotated screen, the "x" first
appears on the second 8 pixel vertical band from the left. If I slowly move the
window down, the "X" moves down twice as fast and skips 32 pixel vertical
blocks on the way down. When it leaves the bottom of the screen, it appears at
the top in the left most 8 pixel band and moves down without skipping blocks
(but still at twice the speed the windows is moving down). As soon as any part
of the window appears on the rotated screen, moving the window is no longer
smooth. The mouse does NOT behave strangely on the rotated screen, and if a
window opens on the rotated screen, and I move the mouse slowly down the screen
until it changes shape (as it crosses the top edge) and then changes back, I
can click and drag the window to the left display where I can work with it. The
mouse arrow does NOT move down the rotated display twice as fast as it would on
the left display, so when it changes shape as I cross onto a window, any
recognizable elements of that window are twice as far down the display as the
mouse arrow. As I said, a screen shot shows the rotated monitor as it would be
if the driver were working properly.

This is not a hardware problem; the other machine only has one display, but
when I use xrandr to rotate it, the display fractures as described above (for
all --rotate options but "normal"). Inverting the display does not change the
orientation of the 8x32 bit blocks; they still look like interlacing with the
8-bit wide bands parallel to the normal top/bottom of the display. Both
machines work fine with Windows XP and worked fine until 16.04 was installed. A
64 bit installation with an NVIDIA video card does not have the problem.

I recognize that this may be a bug for the people at ATI/Radeon, but have no
idea where to submit it; and I'm guessing bugs.freedesktop.org knows. I'm not
even sure there's any point in providing the results of sudo lspci -vv, because
since 'Print Screen' works, this has all the signs of being a problem with how
the virtual desktop in memory is being sent to the display. However, for what
it's worth, I've attached a copy.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-driver-ati/attachments/20160906/d34fc7a8/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the xorg-driver-ati mailing list