[PATCH xf86-video-ati 1/2] EXA/6xx/7xx: fast solid pixmap support

[tan.hu at zte.com.cn]

Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> wrote on 2016-05-24 16:52:23:
> 
> Hi Tan,
> 
> 
> unfortunately, your mailer seems to have mangled your patches, so they
> can't be applied. Can you re-send the patches with git send-email, or
> maybe provide access to a Git tree containing the changes?
> 

I have resend the patch with git, please check it.

> 
> On 17.05.2016 19:17, tan.hu at zte.com.cn wrote:
> > 
> > r6xx still be used on some machine, 
> 
> Doesn't glamor work well on those machines with a current version of
> xserver? If not, what specific issues are there?
> 

Glamor works well on those machines. Those machines are base on MIPS 
architecture, they have a poorer CPU performance and bus bandwidth than 
common x86 machines. When we want to optimise the graphics performace 
further, Maybe exa is a better choice. I think glamor might have a 
better performance on newer hardware(is this right ?), and we want to
improve exa performance as much as possible to compare with glamor.

> -- 
> Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
> Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer

--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transmitted herewith) is privileged and confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s).  If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of the information contained is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this mail in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.