Bug#672644: X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade
daenzer at debian.org
Tue May 15 00:32:14 PDT 2012
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 23:53 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:46:45PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:46:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 21:33:21 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > > So it looks like when it's missing, X gets it loaded, but not fast
> > > > enough to apply to the same session...?
> > >
> > > Correct. Closing as not a bug.
> > Uhh, what? a) we know that users will be screwed and yet we'll declare the
> > screwage "not a bug"?!
How will they be 'screwed'? It seems like most people are making similar
upgrades without issues.
> > b) you didn't notice my earlier message where I found it's an open
> > bug upstream (with several submitters)?
> I see now that Michel also marked that one "resolved wontfix".
> Well, that's a great way to treat four bug submitters - nobody cares for
> your problem, and that's not all - your reports are so worthless to us
> that we also want to make an extra effort to publicly act like complete
> assholes towards you.
Watch your tone. You're barking up the wrong tree.
I did point out this problem a long time ago, but according to Dave
Airlie it's not really possible to make the X driver reliably detect
that KMS will be enabled in this scenario. In order to alleviate the
problem, I made the X driver bail. Previously, it would start up in UMS
mode, resulting in the kernel and X drivers both accessing the hardware
behind each other's backs. I hope you can see the potential for fun
Feel free to prove Dave wrong, but I just don't think it's worth it for
a corner case caused by broken configuration.
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer
More information about the xorg-driver-ati