Bug#658636: Acknowledgement (xserver-xorg-video-radeon: Multiple DRI regressions)
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Wed Feb 8 05:25:28 PST 2012
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Witold Baryluk <baryluk at smp.if.uj.edu.pl> wrote:
> So why there are two incompatible drivers, especially when radeon looks
> to be providing framebuffer anyway? Is radeonfb module supporting even
> some older hardware so it is keeped in kernel?
radeon covers all hw radeonfb covers and more. The reason radeonfb is
still around is that it covers a few corner cases (suspend and resume
on ppc mac cards) which hasn't been ported over to radeon yet. On
x86, there is no reason to use radeonfb.
More information about the xorg-driver-ati