[PATCH 4/6] drm/radeon: Add a rmb() in IH processing

Alex Deucher alexdeucher at gmail.com
Wed Jul 13 07:48:20 PDT 2011


On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>> We should have a read memory barrier between reading the WPTR from
>> memory and reading ring entries based on that value (ie, we need to
>> ensure both loads are done in order by the CPU).
>>
>> It could be argued that the MMIO reads in r600_ack_irq() might be
>> enough to get that barrier but I prefer keeping an explicit one just
>> in case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>

evergreen.c will need a similar fix.

Alex

>
>> ---
>>
>> (resent adding dri-devel to the CC list to hit patchwork)
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c |    3 +++
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
>> index 3c86b15..7e5c801 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
>> @@ -3312,6 +3312,9 @@ int r600_irq_process(struct radeon_device *rdev)
>>        }
>>
>>  restart_ih:
>> +       /* Order reading of wptr vs. reading of IH ring data */
>> +       wmb();
>> +
>>        /* display interrupts */
>>        r600_irq_ack(rdev);
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


More information about the xorg-driver-ati mailing list