Bug#472252: xserver-xorg-video-ati: New AtomBIOS symbol names conflict with radeonhd driver
pcpa at mandriva.com.br
pcpa at mandriva.com.br
Sun Mar 23 11:22:57 PDT 2008
Quoting Julien Cristau <jcristau at debian.org>:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:44:25 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>> * symbols conflicts, probably won't ever be fixed.
>
> uh? I don't think that should be the case. It shouldn't be too hard to
> mark internal symbols for each driver with _X_INTERNAL so they aren't
> exported, or build with -Bsymbolic or similar.
I think you mean't _X_HIDDEN. Using internal or private visibility is
most likely to cause obscure bugs. Talking about it, I have posted patches
and updated the related bugzilla entries several times, to allow compiling
everything with -fvisibility=hidden; this includes fixing several symbol
name clashes.
But I don't think it would be the proper solution for this problem,
because the usage of hidden symbols should be an option, and if not
enabling it, it should just make all symbols visible.
I think the proper solution should be to have a single AtomBios module
that would be shared by radeon and radeonhd. And probably compile it in
the server tree, somehow following the pattern of the different int10
backends.
> Cheers,
> Julien
Paulo
More information about the xorg-driver-ati
mailing list