Radeonhd repo not migrated to gitlab.

[Luc Verhaegen]

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 04:24:30PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 16:00, Kevin Brace <kevinbrace at gmx.com> wrote:
> > I am not here to side with either one of you (i.e., Luc or you), but I have been wondering why some of the older, neglected (I use the word "underserved" to describe it) DDXs in general have weird git and ssh clone addresses.
> > For example, Number Nine Imagine 128 DDX.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Why do I see this xorg/xserver-test for xorg/driver/xf86-video-i128?
> >     Another example will be S3 ViRGE DDX.
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > This time I see xorg/driver/xf86-video-p690.
> >     I probably should not get into the conspiracy theory territory, but for some of the underserved DDXs some months ago, the git and ssh cloning addresses were definitely pointing to xorg/driver/xf86-video-radeonhd.
> > It was about roughly when you were working on GitLab migration.
> > Considering that the history between you and Luc, is there a good explanation for why the cloning addresses for git and ssh were pointing to xorg/driver/xf86-video-radeonhd back then?
> > I have been wondering if this was some kind of a prank considering the history of xf86-video-radeonhd.
> > I do not have a personal stake in what happened between you and Luc some years ago, but if you can try to correct the wrong git and ssh cloning address issue, that will be appreciated.
> 
> Sure, I've fixed it now, though it might take a few minutes to finish updating.
> 
> In the shell script we use to generate cgitrc, we were looping over
> all the repositories and either printing a GitLab clone URL if the
> tree was mirrored from GitLab to cgit, or printing anongit clone URLs
> if not. In the former case, we were forgetting to clear the variables
> with the anongit URLs, so GitLab repos would show the anongit clone
> URLs of the last non-GitLab repo found (if any).
> 
> Hence xf86-video-radeonhd appearing in some drivers (as it was
> inadvertently missed until this thread), xserver-test appearing in
> others (as it was deliberately not migrated), and xf86-video-p690 (not
> migrated as it's empty).

So you claim that you _deliberately_ avoided migrating both xserver-test 
and xf86-video-p690, and that radeonhd was _accidentally_ missed?

Those not migrated repos stick out like sore thumbs on cgit.fd.o.

More people definitely would've noticed it. And i wonder how many of 
them decided to either not open up the can of worms, and avoid suffering 
the political consequences, or who somewhat revelled in the fact that it 
was not migrated. I have not trawled irclogs yet to see if anyone 
brought it up there, like what happened in 2010:

https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2010-November/051783.html

Luc Verhaegen.