[PATCH xserver] modesetting: Fix page flipping under DRI 3.2.
Mario Kleiner
mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com
Fri Mar 23 14:07:34 UTC 2018
Unfortunately not the real fix. I developed the same patch like you
propose in that bugzilla as a 1st try:
--- a/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/drmmode_display.c
+++ b/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/drmmode_display.c
@@ -711,9 +711,9 @@ drmmode_create_bo(drmmode_ptr drmmode, drmmode_bo *bo,
uint32_t format;
if (drmmode->scrn->depth == 30)
- format = GBM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010;
+ format = GBM_FORMAT_XRGB2101010;
else
- format = GBM_FORMAT_ARGB8888;
+ format = GBM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
bo->width = width;
bo->height = height;
While that makes modesetting work, now pageflipping is broken again.
And if i select screen depth 30 i don't make it through server
startup, but the server crashes somewhere deep inside pixman. And if i
change formats inside glamor/glamor_egl.c to be consistent with the
new gbm bo then that doesn't help either. For reference, part II of
doesn't work either:
diff --git a/glamor/glamor_egl.c b/glamor/glamor_egl.c
index 2ea3efc58..787a16620 100644
--- a/glamor/glamor_egl.c
+++ b/glamor/glamor_egl.c
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@ glamor_make_pixmap_exportable(PixmapPtr pixmap)
}
if (pixmap->drawable.depth == 30)
- format = GBM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010;
+ format = GBM_FORMAT_XRGB2101010;
else
- format = GBM_FORMAT_ARGB8888;
+ format = GBM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
#ifdef GBM_BO_WITH_MODIFIERS
if (glamor_egl->dmabuf_capable) {
@@ -442,9 +442,9 @@ glamor_back_pixmap_from_fd(PixmapPtr pixmap,
import_data.height = height;
import_data.stride = stride;
if (depth == 30)
- import_data.format = GBM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010;
+ import_data.format = GBM_FORMAT_XRGB2101010;
else
- import_data.format = GBM_FORMAT_ARGB8888;
+ import_data.format = GBM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
bo = gbm_bo_import(glamor_egl->gbm, GBM_BO_IMPORT_FD, &import_data, 0);
if (!bo)
return FALSE;
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ gbm_format_for_depth(CARD8 depth)
case 24:
return GBM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
case 30:
- return GBM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010;
+ return GBM_FORMAT_XRGB2101010;
default:
ErrorF("unexpected depth: %d\n", depth);
case 32:
So we need something more clever. weston does use fallback formats,
substituting ARGB by XRGB for what it passes to the kernel, if it
wants to do a zero-copy present of a fullscreen wayland surface/buffer
via pageflipping (in compositor-drm.c
drm_output_check_scanout_format()).
-mario
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:09 PM, Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. However, seems we may have one more problem with the new code
>> on slightly older < gen 9 Intel hw. Either that, or something is
>> botched on my system atm., after pulling in all kind of updates to
>> xorg-proto and xcb-proto and libdrm and stuff to make the server and
>> mesa compile again.
>>
>> Using x-server/mesa master from last friday plus my patch, everything
>> was fine when testing on radeon-kms and nouveau-kms, but when i tested
>> on Intel IvyBridge (gen 5), i stared at a blank screen. Xorg log
>> reported modeset failure with EINVAL iirc, the kernel at drm.debug
>> level 1 reported:
>>
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235103]
>> [drm:drm_atomic_set_mode_prop_for_crtc [drm]] Set [MODE:] for CRTC
>> state ffff9496185e3000
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235112]
>> [drm:drm_mode_object_put [drm]] OBJ ID: 81 (4)
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235122]
>> [drm:drm_mode_object_put [drm]] OBJ ID: 81 (3)
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235133]
>> [drm:drm_mode_object_get [drm]] OBJ ID: 50 (5)
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235142]
>> [drm:drm_mode_object_get [drm]] OBJ ID: 50 (6)
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235152]
>> [drm:drm_atomic_get_connector_state [drm]] Added
>> [CONNECTOR:50:HDMI-A-1] ffff9495e9629c00 state to ffff94961bb27400
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235162]
>> [drm:drm_mode_object_put [drm]] OBJ ID: 50 (7)
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235171]
>> [drm:drm_atomic_check_only [drm]] checking ffff94961bb27400
>>
>> HERE -->
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235181]
>> [drm:drm_atomic_check_only [drm]] Invalid pixel format AR24
>> little-endian (0x34325241)
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235189]
>> [drm:drm_atomic_check_only [drm]] [PLANE:26:primary A] atomic core
>> check failed
>> Mar 16 19:30:48 kleinerm-MaxtorLinux kernel: [ 576.235198]
>> [drm:drm_atomic_state_default_clear [drm]] Clearing atomic state
>> ffff94961bb27400
>>
>> This makes sense, as looking at i915-kms, Intel hw before Skylake does
>> not support setting ARGB pixel formats, only Skylake and later do.
>> Iirc radeon/amdgpu/nouveau-kms treat ARGB formats like XRGB formats,
>> so they are nominally supported, even if ARGB is simply mapped to XRGB
>> hw programming for scanout on some hw.
>>
>> In modesetting ddx, we create gbm buffers as either ARGB8888 or
>> ARGB2101010, not checking if hw supports this. When using the new
>> drmAddFB2WithModifiers ioctl, we choose format to be whatever the gbm
>> buffers format is, so that might end badly. When i tried the obvious
>> hack of switching to depth 24 -> XRGB8888 and depth 30 -> XRGB2101010
>> i gbm buffer creation, that made modesetting work again at depth 24,
>> but now broke pageflipping again. For depth 30 it died somewhere deep
>> in pixman during server startup.
>>
>> Looking at the current code in glamor and modesetting ddx, using
>> XRGB8888 and XRGB2101010 consistently for depth 24 or depth 30 would
>> actually make more sense to me than ARGB8888 and ARGB2101010, but
>> hacking that in didn't immediately improve the situation.
>>
>> That was the point when i decided it is weekend.
>>
>> Maybe we need some fallback mapping of gbm formats to xrgb fallback
>> pixel formats, just for the code path of drmAddFB2WithModifiers,
>> similar to what we do in weston for the direct scanout path? Create
>> buffers in ARGB, but submit them as XRGB for scanout?
>
>
> Yeap, I ended up at the same point in downstream bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558476, yet using XRGB8888
> instead of ARGB8888 fixes the issue reliably here...
>
> Cheers,
> Olivier
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list