Merged repo for protocol headers? Why are they split?

[Dylan Baker]

Quoting Keith Packard (2017-11-21 12:51:24)
> Adam Jackson <ajax at nwnk.net> writes:
> 
> > Also, git://people.freedesktop.org/~keithp/newproto appears to contain
> > the script used to generate the merged repo.
> 
> Right, that's probably more useful today. The trick was to get the
> headers merged without losing any of the history.
> 
> > I would be entirely in favor of merging the protocol header repos,
> > fwiw. For that matter I'd be in favor of generating them from the xcb
> > xml, but let's burn one bridge at a time.
> 
> Who wants to take another run at this wall?
> 
> -- 
> -keith

Your script splits each proto into a subdirectory, does it really make sense to
do that, or should the final proto package have everything together in the root?

Dylan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20171121/edc90715/attachment-0001.sig>