x11perf putimagexy10 extremly slow for glamor on i965

[Keith Packard]

Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy at gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I have observed extremly low x11perf-putimagexy10 results when using
> glamor on top of the i965 driver - while shmput10 results are quite
> ok.

Why do you care? xy format images are not something you should be using
at all; they were designed for 1980s era Apollo workstations.

-- 
-keith
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20170514/e1c01415/attachment.sig>