[PATCH xserver 02/10 v2] glamor: Require that 16bpp pixmap depths match for Render copies.
Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net
Sun Sep 25 18:53:11 UTC 2016
Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> writes:
> On 23/09/16 09:51 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Michel Dänzer <michel at daenzer.net> writes:
>>> On 23/09/16 04:57 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>>> The copy optimization in d37329cba42fa8e72fe4be8a7be18e512268b5bd
>>>> replicated a bug from last time we did a copy optimization, and didn't
>>>> get rendercheck run on it.
>>>
>>> Actually, I'm pretty sure I did run rendercheck, but didn't notice the
>>> regression due to the radeonsi bug affecting the same test. Please
>>> consider removing that language from the commit log.
>>
>> OK. I'll drop the comment about running rendercheck.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>> We do need some concerted effort on actually fixing our rendering bugs
>> and reenabling the skipped tests. I've spent a while trying to come up
>> with why the remaining rendercheck test fails and come up with nothing
>> yet.
>
> How can others help with this?
I fixed the remaining glamor-specific case in the scripts on the plane.
Now we're down to:
# Skip some tests that are failing at the time of importing the script.
# "REPORT: min_bounds, rbearing was 0, expecting 2"
PIGLIT_ARGS="$PIGLIT_ARGS -x xlistfontswithinfo at 3"
PIGLIT_ARGS="$PIGLIT_ARGS -x xlistfontswithinfo at 4"
PIGLIT_ARGS="$PIGLIT_ARGS -x xloadqueryfont at 1"
PIGLIT_ARGS="$PIGLIT_ARGS -x xqueryfont at 1"
PIGLIT_ARGS="$PIGLIT_ARGS -x xqueryfont at 2"
# "REPORT: Incorrect pixel on inside of area at point (0, 0): 0x0 != 0x1"
PIGLIT_ARGS="$PIGLIT_ARGS -x xgetimage at 7"
PIGLIT_ARGS="$PIGLIT_ARGS -x xgetsubimage at 7"
in the current XTS set across fb and glamor/llvmpipe. XGetImage/7 seems
to be BadMatching. I have no idea about the font thing, but it doesn't
seem too rendering-related either.
So, at this point, I think it's up to us to go bang on our hardware 3D
drivers to make sure that they're rendering glamor correctly. Sending
out a script to make that easier, even if we're not going to put it in
make check.
For i965, I'm seeing failures in:
rendercheck/blend/over:
Beginning blend test on a4r4g4b4
Over blend test error of 15.0000 at (0, 0) --
R G B A
got: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
expected: 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
src color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 (a8)
dst color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
src: 1x1R a8, dst: a4r4g4b4
Beginning blend test on a4b4g4r4
Over blend test error of 15.0000 at (0, 0) --
R G B A
got: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
expected: 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
src color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 (a8)
dst color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
src: 1x1R a8, dst: a4b4g4r4
and rendercheck/blend/src:
Beginning blend test on b8g8r8a8
Src blend test error of 255.0000 at (0, 0) --
R G B A
got: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
expected: 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
src color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 (a8)
dst color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
src: 1x1R a8, dst: b8g8r8a8
Beginning blend test on a4r4g4b4
Src blend test error of 15.0000 at (0, 0) --
R G B A
got: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
expected: 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
src color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 (a8)
dst color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
src: 1x1R a8, dst: a4r4g4b4
Beginning blend test on a4b4g4r4
Src blend test error of 15.0000 at (0, 0) --
R G B A
got: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
expected: 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
src color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 (a8)
dst color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
src: 1x1R a8, dst: a4b4g4r4
and rendercheck/cacomposite/all/a8:
Ignoring server-supported format: x2b10g10r10
Beginning composite CA mask test on a8
Saturate CA composite test error of 128.0000 at (0, 0) --
R G B A
got: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.498
expected: 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
src color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
msk color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50
dst color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
src: 1x1R a8, mask: 1x1R a8, dst: a8
Beginning composite CA mask test on a8r8g8b8
DisjointIn CA composite test error of 255.0000 at (0, 0) --
R G B A
got: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
expected: 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
src color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
msk color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
dst color: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
and rendercheck/triangles:
Beginning Dst Triangles test on a8
triangles test error of 255.0000 at (0, 0) --
R G B A
got: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
expected: 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000
...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20160925/db53aa73/attachment.sig>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list