[PATCH xserver] modesetting: resubmit dirty rects on EINVAL
walter harms
wharms at bfs.de
Sat Jul 16 09:28:54 UTC 2016
Am 15.07.2016 17:28, schrieb Adam Jackson:
> This error code can mean we're submitting more rects at once than the
> driver can handle. If that happens, resubmit one at a time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c b/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c
> index 262a899..2de16f6 100644
> --- a/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c
> +++ b/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c
> @@ -515,6 +515,17 @@ dispatch_dirty_region(ScrnInfoPtr scrn,
>
> /* TODO query connector property to see if this is needed */
> ret = drmModeDirtyFB(ms->fd, fb_id, clip, num_cliprects);
> +
> + /* if we're swamping it with work, try one at a time */
> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> + for (i = 0; i < num_cliprects; i++) {
> + if (drmModeDirtyFB(ms->fd, fb_id, &clip[i], 1) == -EINVAL)
> + break;
> + }
> + if (i == num_cliprects)
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +
maybe these more simple version works also ?
if (ret == -EINVAL) {
for (i = 0; i < num_cliprects; i++) {
ret=drmModeDirtyFB(ms->fd, fb_id, &clip[i], 1);
if ( ret == -EINVAL)
break;
}
}
the whole thing works only if drmModeDirtyFB() never returns something else
than -EINVAL. Perhaps it is more robust just to check for <0 ?
(note: i am not an expert on this, just curious)
re,
wh
> free(clip);
> DamageEmpty(damage);
> }
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list