[PATCH] present: Fix Async swap logic
Axel Davy
axel.davy at ens.fr
Tue Nov 3 23:26:21 PST 2015
On 04/11/2015 04:17, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 03.11.2015 17:14, Axel Davy wrote:
>> According to the spec, PresentOptionAsync should only
>> trigger a different behaviour when the target msc has been reached.
>>
>> In this case if the driver is able to do async swaps, we use
>> them to avoid a screen copy.
>>
>> When the target msc hasn't been reached yet, we want to use sync swaps.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Davy <axel.davy at ens.fr>
>> ---
>> I'm not sure for indentation, I tried to do the same than previous check
>> present/present.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/present/present.c b/present/present.c
>> index beb4ff0..3b8679c 100644
>> --- a/present/present.c
>> +++ b/present/present.c
>> @@ -836,19 +836,22 @@ present_pixmap(WindowPtr window,
>> vblank->notifies = notifies;
>> vblank->num_notifies = num_notifies;
>>
>> - if (!(options & PresentOptionAsync))
>> - vblank->sync_flip = TRUE;
>> -
>> - if (!(options & PresentOptionCopy) &&
>> - !((options & PresentOptionAsync) &&
>> - (!screen_priv->info ||
>> - !(screen_priv->info->capabilities & PresentCapabilityAsync))) &&
>> - pixmap != NULL &&
>> - present_check_flip (target_crtc, window, pixmap, vblank->sync_flip, valid, x_off, y_off))
>> - {
>> - vblank->flip = TRUE;
>> - if (vblank->sync_flip)
>> - target_msc--;
>> + if (pixmap != NULL &&
>> + !(options & PresentOptionCopy) &&
>> + screen_priv->info) {
>> + if (target_msc > crtc_msc &&
>> + present_check_flip (target_crtc, window, pixmap, TRUE, valid, x_off, y_off))
>> + {
>> + vblank->flip = TRUE;
>> + vblank->sync_flip = TRUE;
>> + target_msc--;
> These three statements should be indented by two more spaces.
Good catch
>
> Also, shouldn't we take this case if !(options & PresentOptionAsync)
> even if target_msc <= crtc_msc?
At this point of the code, we have !(option & PresentOptionAsync) implies
target_msc > crtc_msc. See the part "Adjust target_msc to match modulus"
>
>
>> + } else if (target_msc == crtc_msc &&
>> + (options & PresentOptionAsync) &&
>> + (screen_priv->info->capabilities & PresentCapabilityAsync) &&
>> + present_check_flip (target_crtc, window, pixmap, FALSE, valid, x_off, y_off))
>> + {
>> + vblank->flip = TRUE;
>> + }
> Why only take this case if target_msc == crtc_msc?
At this point of the code, when we have (option & PresentOptionAsync),
target_msc >= crtc_msc
If target_msc > crtc_msc, then we want to use a sync flip (An async flip
can cause tears),
and we use the previous if statement.
But in the case target_msc == crtc_msc, we want to copy immediately (via
an async flip, or a copy).
I realize that the "(option & PresentOptionAsync)" part of the check is
unneccessary.
>
>
Yours,
Axel
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list