[PATCH app/xload 2/2] Don't try to use [gs]et[ug]id on Win32

[Jon TURNEY]

On 22/04/2015 04:42, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> You're not installing this with whatever the equivalent of
> setuid/setgid bits is, are you?  If not, then this makes sense and is:
>
> Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at oracle.com>

I don't think there is any meaningful equivalent of that.  But it's a 
good point, and if access to the current load requires some sort of 
privilege, I think I need to check that the lack of it is correctly handled.

Thank you very much for your review of these patches.