[RFC] [PATCH] Extend block and wakeup handling to cover writes as well

[Pierre Ossman]

On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 07:35:04 -0800,
Keith Packard wrote:

> Pierre Ossman <ossman at cendio.se> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, 25 Dec 2014 13:55:13 -0800,
> > Keith Packard wrote:
> >
> >> Pierre Ossman <ossman at cendio.se> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Please see the attached patch and see if this seems like a reasonable
> >> > way to solve this. I thought about changing the BlockHandlerProc
> >> > definition, but it is exposed in application headers so it didn't seem
> >> > safe to touch.
> >> 
> >> I think we should just change the BlockHandlerProc definition to include
> >> the write data as well. Either change requires updating every place
> >> these functions are used anyways.
> >> 
> >
> > How about these patches then?
> 
> Yup, that looks good.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com>
> 

Great. Can it get queued up for the next releases in that case?

Rgds
-- 
Pierre Ossman           Software Development
Cendio AB		https://cendio.com
Teknikringen 8		https://twitter.com/ThinLinc
583 30 Linköping	https://facebook.com/ThinLinc
Phone: +46-13-214600	https://plus.google.com/+CendioThinLinc

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20150126/d63529b7/attachment.sig>