[PATCH] xkbcomp: Improved -w option parsing
Peter Hutterer
peter.hutterer at who-t.net
Wed Oct 29 19:41:54 PDT 2014
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:50:30AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> This patch improves -w option parsing even further, for cases like
> "xkbcomp -w6 4.xkb out.xkb" (which were not handled by the fix of
> #66344). Moreover, though this form can be regarded as ambiguous,
> the warning level is still optional (set to 0 if not present), and
> errors like "xkbcomp -wfoo in out" are detected and reported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Lefevre <vincent at vinc17.net>
pushed, thanks.
d4e02a0..978998a master -> master
Cheers,
Peter
> ---
> xkbcomp.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xkbcomp.c b/xkbcomp.c
> index 956e79c..adfa89a 100644
> --- a/xkbcomp.c
> +++ b/xkbcomp.c
> @@ -576,17 +576,37 @@ parseArgs(int argc, char *argv[])
> }
> else if (strncmp(argv[i], "-w", 2) == 0)
> {
> - if ((i >= (argc - 1)) || (!isdigit(argv[i + 1][0])))
> + unsigned long utmp;
> + char *tmp2;
> + /* If text is just after "-w" in the same word, then it must
> + * be a number and it is the warning level. Otherwise, if the
> + * next argument is a number, then it is the warning level,
> + * else the warning level is assumed to be 0.
> + */
> + if (argv[i][2] == '\0')
> {
> warningLevel = 0;
> - if (isdigit(argv[i][2]))
> - if (sscanf(&argv[i][2], "%i", &itmp) == 1)
> - warningLevel = itmp;
> + if (i < argc - 1)
> + {
> + utmp = strtoul(argv[i+1], &tmp2, 10);
> + if (argv[i+1][0] != '\0' && *tmp2 == '\0')
> + {
> + warningLevel = utmp > 10 ? 10 : utmp;
> + i++;
> + }
> + }
> }
> else
> {
> - if (sscanf(argv[++i], "%i", &itmp) == 1)
> - warningLevel = itmp;
> + utmp = strtoul(&argv[i][2], &tmp2, 10);
> + if (*tmp2 == '\0')
> + warningLevel = utmp > 10 ? 10 : utmp;
> + else
> + {
> + ERROR1("Unknown flag \"%s\" on command line\n", argv[i]);
> + Usage(argc, argv);
> + return False;
> + }
> }
> }
> else if ((strcmp(argv[i], "-xkb") == 0) && (!xkblist))
> --
> 2.1.1
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel at lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list