[PATCH:cf 1/2] NetBSD: add AMD64Architecture, fix Arm32Architecture.
Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
Sun Mar 23 09:21:39 PDT 2014
On 03/23/14 08:36 AM, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:45:04PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 02:33:21PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>>> On 03/20/14 05:36 AM, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Klausner <wiz at NetBSD.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Imake.cf | 7 ++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Imake.cf b/Imake.cf
>>>> index 2b6c649..9e438e7 100644
>>>> --- a/Imake.cf
>>>> +++ b/Imake.cf
>>>> @@ -238,8 +238,9 @@ XCOMM $XFree86: xc/config/cf/Imake.cf,v 3.88 2003/12/16 21:30:21 herrb Exp $
>>>> # ifdef mc68000
>>>> # define Mc68020Architecture
>>>> # endif
>>>> -# ifdef __arm32__
>>>> +# if defined(__arm__) || defined(__arm32__)
>>>> # define Arm32Architecture
>>>> +# undef __arm__
>>>
>>> So __arm__ won't be set for 64-bit ARM platforms on NetBSD?
>>
>> We'll worry about that later :) 64-bit ARM is work-in-progress AFAIK.
>>
>> I don't think that __arm32__ is set for (some? many?) 32-bit ARM
>> platforms though.
>
> I've asked to make sure:
> __arm__ is the proper test for arm32
> __aarch64__ is the one for arm64
>
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-arm/2014/03/23/msg002305.html
Okay then, not the most obvious convention, but if it's what you use, then go
for it.
Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at oracle.com>
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
More information about the xorg-devel
mailing list