[RFC] Automatic modifier update of slave devices

[Keith Packard]

Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer at who-t.net> writes:

> tbh, at this point I'm in preference of 3 (i.e. mirroring locking modifiers),
> mainly because it seems the most obvious and intuitive solution.

I concur -- the locking modifier state should match the master, and the
LED state should reflect those. Simple and consistent.

-- 
keith.packard at intel.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 810 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/attachments/20140310/f13d49e1/attachment.pgp>